[PATCH 06/13] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver

[Clement LE GOFFIC]

On 6/23/25 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[...]

Hi Krzysztof,

Sorry I forgot to address comments below.

>> +
>> +static const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg_mp1 = {
>> +	.regs = &stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec_mp1,
>> +	.attribute = stm32_ddr_pmu_attr_groups_mp1,
>> +	.counters_nb = MP1_CNT_NB,
>> +	.evt_counters_nb = MP1_CNT_NB - 1, /* Time counter is not an event counter */
>> +	.time_cnt_idx = MP1_TIME_CNT_IDX,
>> +	.get_counter = stm32_ddr_pmu_get_event_counter_mp1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg_mp2 = {
>> +	.regs = &stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec_mp2,
>> +	.attribute = stm32_ddr_pmu_attr_groups_mp2,
>> +	.counters_nb = MP2_CNT_NB,
>> +	.evt_counters_nb = MP2_CNT_NB - 1, /* Time counter is an event counter */
>> +	.time_cnt_idx = MP2_TIME_CNT_IDX,
>> +	.get_counter = stm32_ddr_pmu_get_event_counter_mp2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops stm32_ddr_pmu_pm_ops = {
>> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, stm32_ddr_pmu_device_resume)
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stm32_ddr_pmu_of_match[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "st,stm32mp131-ddr-pmu",
>> +		.data = &stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg_mp1
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "st,stm32mp151-ddr-pmu",
>> +		.data = &stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg_mp1
> 
> So devices are compatible, thus express it correctly and drop this.

Ok so I assume this comes with your comment in the bindings and 
basically don't get you point here.
Can you please be more precise ?

> 
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "st,stm32mp251-ddr-pmu",
>> +		.data = &stm32_ddr_pmu_cfg_mp2
>> +	},
>> +	{ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_ddr_pmu_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver stm32_ddr_pmu_driver = {
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> +		.pm = &stm32_ddr_pmu_pm_ops,
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stm32_ddr_pmu_of_match),
> 
> Drop of_match_ptr, you have here warnings.

Yes Indeed.
I'll also fix the pm pointer by using "pm_sleep_ptr".

Best regards,
Clément

> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof