arm64: BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in arch_stack_walk
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Mon Jun 23 04:56:06 PDT 2025
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 02:57:16PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:33 PM Breno Leitao <leitao at debian.org> wrote:
> > I'm encountering a KASAN warning during aarch64 boot and I am struggling
> > to determine the cause. I haven't come across any reports about this on
> > the mailing list so far, so I'm sharing this early in case others are
> > seeing it too.
> >
> > This issue occurs both on Linus's upstream branch and in the 6.15 final
> > release. The stack trace below is from 6.15 final. I haven't started
> > bisecting yet, but that's my next step.
> >
> > Here are a few details about the problem:
> >
> > 1) it happen on my kernel boots on a aarch64 host
> > 2) The lines do not match the code very well, and I am not sure why. It
> > seems it is offset by two lines. The stack is based on commit
> > 0ff41df1cb26 ("Linux 6.15")
> > 3) My config is at https://pastebin.com/ye46bEK9
> >
> >
> > [ 235.831690] ==================================================================
> > [ 235.861238] BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in arch_stack_walk (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:346 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:387)
> > [ 235.887206] Write of size 96 at addr a5ff80008ae8fb80 by task kworker/u288:26/3666
> > [ 235.918139] Pointer tag: [a5], memory tag: [00]
> > [ 235.942722] Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
> > [ 235.942732] Call trace:
> > [ 235.942734] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:468) (C)
> > [ 235.942741] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
> > [ 235.942748] print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:409 mm/kasan/report.c:521)
> > [ 235.942755] kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:636)
> > [ 235.942759] kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/sw_tags.c:85)
> > [ 235.942764] memset (mm/kasan/shadow.c:53)
> > [ 235.942769] arch_stack_walk (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:346 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:387)
> > [ 235.942773] return_address (arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c:44)
> > [ 235.942778] trace_hardirqs_off.part.0 (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:95)
> > [ 235.942784] trace_hardirqs_off_finish (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:98)
> > [ 235.942789] enter_from_kernel_mode (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:62)
> > [ 235.942794] el1_interrupt (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:559 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:575)
> > [ 235.942799] el1h_64_irq_handler (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:581)
> > [ 235.942804] el1h_64_irq (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:596)
> > [ 235.942809] 0x3c52ff1ecc (P)
> > [ 235.942825] 0x3c52ff0ed4
> > [ 235.942829] 0x3c52f902d0
> > [ 235.942833] 0x3c52f953e8
> > [ 235.942837] __efi_rt_asm_wrapper (arch/arm64/kernel/efi-rt-wrapper.S:49)
> > [ 235.942843] efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:269)
> > [ 235.942848] process_one_work (./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:110 kernel/workqueue.c:3243)
> > [ 235.942854] worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3313 kernel/workqueue.c:3400)
> > [ 235.942858] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:464)
> > [ 235.942863] ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863)
> >
> > [ 236.436924] The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at
> > [a5ff80008ae80000, a5ff80008aea0000) created by:
> > arm64_efi_rt_init (arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c:219)
> >
> > [ 236.506959] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> > [ 236.529724] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12682
> > [ 236.562077] flags: 0x17fffd6c0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff|kasantag=0x5b)
> > [ 236.593722] raw: 017fffd6c0000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
> > [ 236.625365] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> > [ 236.657004] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> >
> > [ 236.685828] Memory state around the buggy address:
> > [ 236.705390] ffff80008ae8f900: 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5
> > [ 236.734899] ffff80008ae8fa00: a5 a5 a5 00 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5
> > [ 236.764409] >ffff80008ae8fb00: 00 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 00
> > [ 236.793918] ^
> > [ 236.818810] ffff80008ae8fc00: a7 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5
> > [ 236.848321] ffff80008ae8fd00: a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5
> > [ 236.877828] ==================================================================
>
> Looks like the memory allocated/mapped in arm64_efi_rt_init() is
> tagged by __vmalloc_node(). And this memory then gets used as a
> (irq-related? EFI-related?) stack. And having the SP register tagged
> breaks SW_TAGS instrumentation AFAIR [1], which is likely what
> produces this report.
>
> Adding kasan_reset_tag() to arm64_efi_rt_init() should likely fix
> this; similar to what we have in arch_alloc_vmap_stack(). Or should we
> make arm64_efi_rt_init() just call arch_alloc_vmap_stack()?
In theory, we can still disable the vmap stack, so we either fall back
to something else or require that EFI runtime depends on VMAP_STACK.
We can do like init_sdei_stacks(), just bail out if VMAP_STACK is
disabled.
Adding Ard, it's his code.
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=51fb34de2a4c8fa0f221246313700bfe3b6c586d
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list