[PATCH v5 01/13] dt-bindings: net: mediatek,net: update for mt7988

[Daniel Golle]

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:35:32AM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
> 
> Update binding for mt7988 which has 3 gmac and 2 reg items.
> 
> MT7988 has 4 FE IRQs (currently only 2 are used) and the 4 IRQs for
> use with RSS/LRO later.
> 
> Add interrupt-names to make them accessible by name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w at public-files.de>
> ---
> v5:
> - fix v4 logmessage and change description a bit describing how i get
>   the irq count.
> - update binding for 8 irqs with different names (rx,tx => fe0..fe3)
>   including the 2 reserved irqs which can be used later
> - change rx-ringX to pdmaX to be closer to hardware documentation
> 
> v4:
> - increase max interrupts to 6 because of adding RSS/LRO interrupts (4)
>   and dropping 2 reserved irqs (0+3) around rx+tx
> - dropped Robs RB due to this change
> - allow interrupt names
> - add interrupt-names without reserved IRQs on mt7988
>   this requires mtk driver patch:
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250616080738.117993-2-linux@fw-web.de/
> 
> v2:
> - change reg to list of items
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> index 9e02fd80af83..9465b40683ad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@ properties:
>        - ralink,rt5350-eth
>  
>    reg:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - description: Register for accessing the MACs.
> +      - description: SoC internal SRAM used for DMA operations.
> +    minItems: 1
>  
>    clocks:
>      minItems: 2
> @@ -40,7 +43,11 @@ properties:
>  
>    interrupts:
>      minItems: 1
> -    maxItems: 4
> +    maxItems: 8
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 8

Shouldn't interrupt-names only be required for MT7988 (and future SoCs)?
Like this at least one entry in interrupt-names is now always required.