[PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature
Mikołaj Lenczewski
miko.lenczewski at arm.com
Thu Jun 19 04:51:55 PDT 2025
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 19/06/2025 09:57, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:07:41PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> >> On 17/06/2025 10:51, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PAN
> >>> static void cpu_enable_pan(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> >>> {
> >>> @@ -2980,6 +3015,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> >>> .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> >>> ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, EVT, IMP)
> >>> },
> >>> + {
> >>> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_BBML2_NOABORT,
> >>> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_EARLY_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
> >>> + .matches = has_bbml2_noabort,
> >>
> >> Is there a reason you have removed the .desc from this? Without it, the kernel
> >> won't print a "detected" line when it enables the feature. Previously you had:
> >>
> >> .desc = "BBM Level 2 without conflict abort",
> >>
> >>> + },
> >>> {
> >>> .desc = "52-bit Virtual Addressing for KVM (LPA2)",
> >>> .capability = ARM64_HAS_LPA2,
> >>
> >
> > Damn it! I completely forgot to birng that back. Yet another remenant of
> > the NO_BBML2_NOABORT version we had discussed in v6, because a
> > description field would have been confusing due to the double negation:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/83d1f7af-3dc7-45f9-94f3-8a0917c051d2@arm.com/
> >
> > Thank you very much for spotting this Ryan! Ill return the description,
> > and respin on Monday (unless it is possible to do this as a RESEND or
> > similar, but I doubt it since this is technically a functional change) :/
> >
>
> I think probably just send out a new version.
>
ACK
--
Kind regards,
Mikołaj Lenczewski
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list