[RRC v1 2/3] thermal/drivers/exynos: Handle temperature threshold interrupts and clear corresponding IRQs
Anand Moon
linux.amoon at gmail.com
Wed Jun 18 22:45:44 PDT 2025
Hi Mateusz,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 at 17:22, Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2 at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hello :)
>
> > +#define INTSTAT_FALL2 BIT(24)
> > +#define INTSTAT_FALL1 BIT(20)
> > +#define INTSTAT_FALL0 BIT(16)
> > +#define INTSTAT_RISE2 BIT(8)
> > +#define INTSTAT_RISE1 BIT(4)
> > +#define INTSTAT_RISE0 BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define INTCLEAR_FALL2 BIT(24)
> > +#define INTCLEAR_FALL1 BIT(20)
> > +#define INTCLEAR_FALL0 BIT(16)
> > +#define INTCLEAR_RISE2 BIT(8)
> > +#define INTCLEAR_RISE1 BIT(4)
> > +#define INTCLEAR_RISE0 BIT(0)
>
> > + /* Map INTSTAT bits to INTCLEAR bits */
> > + if (val_irq & INTSTAT_FALL2)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_FALL2;
> > + else if (val_irq & INTSTAT_FALL1)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_FALL1;
> > + else if (val_irq & INTSTAT_FALL0)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_FALL0;
> > + else if (val_irq & INTSTAT_RISE2)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_RISE2;
> > + else if (val_irq & INTSTAT_RISE1)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_RISE1;
> > + else if (val_irq & INTSTAT_RISE0)
> > + clearirq |= INTCLEAR_RISE0;
>
> This implies that only these 6 bits are used. Is this true for all SoCs
> supported by this driver? My understanding is that Exynos 5433 in particular
> uses bits 7:0 for rise interrupts and 23:16 for fall interrupts. When I tested
> this patch (both alone and the whole series) on 5433 by running some CPU load,
> the interrupt seemed to not fire consistently:
> /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device1/cur_state would never go above 1 (which is
> consistent with the interrupt firing once, not getting cleared and never firing
> again; without this patch, it consistently went up to 6) and I got a quick
> reboot every time.
>
Thanks for the feedback,
As per the user manual Exynos4412
INTSTAT and INTCLEAR have a clear mapping with bits
falling 20, 16, 12 and rising 8 4 0
whereas Exyno5422 has
INTSTAT and INTCLEAR have a clear mapping with bits
falling 24, 20, 16, and rising 8 4 0
Yes, it could differ for all the SoCs,
I don't have the user manual or TRM for these SoCs
to configure correctly.
I tried to configure this, referring to the comment in the driver
/*
* Clear the interrupts. Please note that the documentation for
* Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
* states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
* responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register. Exynos5420
* and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
* support FALL IRQs at all).
*/
By the way, I don't see Exynos5433 and Exynos7 support
INTSTAT and INTCLEAR registers. We are using TMU_REG_INTPEND
to read and update the same register.
if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260) {
tmu_intstat = EXYNOS5260_TMU_REG_INTSTAT;
tmu_intclear = EXYNOS5260_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR;
} else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
tmu_intstat = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
tmu_intclear = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
} else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
tmu_intstat = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
tmu_intclear = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
} else {
tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT;
tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR;
}
> Thank you,
> Mateusz Majewski
Thanks
Anand
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list