[RFC PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add IRQ handle for smmu impl
Pranjal Shrivastava
praan at google.com
Mon Jun 16 14:32:40 PDT 2025
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:56:11AM +0800, Xueqi Zhang wrote:
> Add IRQ handle for smmu impl
>
> Signed-off-by: Xueqi Zhang <xueqi.zhang at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 9 ++++++++-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index d36124a6bb54..154417b380fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1954,7 +1954,8 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
> arm_smmu_decode_event(smmu, evt, &event);
> if (arm_smmu_handle_event(smmu, evt, &event))
> arm_smmu_dump_event(smmu, evt, &event, &rs);
> -
> + if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->smmu_evt_handler)
> + smmu->impl->smmu_evt_handler(irq, smmu, evt, &rs);
> put_device(event.dev);
> cond_resched();
> }
> @@ -2091,7 +2092,13 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
>
> static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
> {
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
> +
> arm_smmu_gerror_handler(irq, dev);
> +
> + if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->combined_irq_handle)
> + smmu->impl->combined_irq_handle(irq, smmu);
> +
> return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 99eeb6143c49..f45c4bf84bc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>
> struct rb_root streams;
> struct mutex streams_mutex;
> + const struct arm_smmu_v3_impl *impl;
> };
>
> struct arm_smmu_stream {
> @@ -998,6 +999,13 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq, u64 *cmds, int n,
> bool sync);
>
> +/* Implementation details */
> +struct arm_smmu_v3_impl {
> + int (*combined_irq_handle)(int irq, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu_dev);
> + int (*smmu_evt_handler)(int irq, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu_dev,
> + u64 *evt, struct ratelimit_state *rs);
> +};
Let's add these to the exisiting struct arm_smmu_impl_ops and invoke
them like:
if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl_ops->combined_irq_handle)
smmu->impl_ops->combined_irq_handle(irq, smmu);
Or maybe we could merge the existing impl_dev and impl_ops into a single
structure.
> +
> struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_v3_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_MEDIATEK)
> struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_v3_impl_mtk_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
> --
> 2.46.0
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list