[PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: dts: microchip: sama7d65: Add clock name property

[Ryan Wanner]

On 6/7/25 04:57, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi, Ryan,
> 
> On 23.05.2025 23:24, Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com>
>>
>> Add clock-output-names to the xtal nodes, so the driver can correctly
>> register the main and slow xtal.
>>
>> This fixes the issue of the SoC clock driver not being able to find
>> the main xtal and slow xtal correctly causing a bad clock tree.
>>
>> Fixes: 261dcfad1b59 ("ARM: dts: microchip: add sama7d65 SoC DT")
> 
> Can you please prepare a similar fix for sam9x7. It is also affected by
> this, right?
The driver looks for the xtal differently in the sam9x75 than in the
SAMA7 clock drivers, so it is not immediately affected. But I will add a
sam9x7 in the v2 of the patch since in the future it will be needed.

Thank you,
Ryan
> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7d65.dtsi | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7d65.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7d65.dtsi
>> index b6710ccd4c36..7b1dd28a2cfa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7d65.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7d65.dtsi
>> @@ -38,11 +38,13 @@ cpu0: cpu at 0 {
>>       clocks {
>>               main_xtal: clock-mainxtal {
>>                       compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +                     clock-output-names = "main_xtal";
>>                       #clock-cells = <0>;
>>               };
>>
>>               slow_xtal: clock-slowxtal {
>>                       compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +                     clock-output-names = "slow_xtal";
>>                       #clock-cells = <0>;
>>               };
>>       };
>