[PATCH v2 0/2] fix failure of integration IMA with tpm_crb_ffa

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > OK, if ffa_init() is leveled up in the initcall hierarchy, shouldn't
> > that be enough as long as ko's can be found from initramfs?
> 
> As you mentioned, this is handled in Patch #1.
> However, although ffa_init() is called first,
> unless tpm_crb_ffa_init() is also invoked,
> crb_acpi_driver_init() will fail with -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Please note that IMA is always built-in and cannot be built as a module.

Sure but if one needs IMA, then tpm_crb_ffa can be compiled as built-in
with zero code changes.

BR, Jarkko