[PATCH v3 08/10] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8196-afe: add audio AFE document

[Darren Ye (叶飞)]

On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 11:32 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 14/05/2025 12:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 14/05/2025 10:11, Darren.Ye wrote:
> > > From: Darren Ye <darren.ye at mediatek.com>
> > > 
> > > Add mt8196 audio AFE document.
> > 
> > A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "document".
> > See also:
> > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst*L18__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!l3YASE64DTMTp8bOMry9UyBMf-IcYFTvXOlP2DXfpeUEFdQK79xGYEnsxnJuMihVX7_WhEe3q1evSg$
> 
> Since you asked what did you miss from previous review (and I replied
> that EVERYTHING) then maybe this will help:
> 
> How did you implement this?
> 

My mistake, please forgive my carelessness. I will change it to 
ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8196-afe: Add suport for MT8196 audio AFE
controller

THis patch adds initial supoprt for the audio AFE(Audio Front End)
controller on the Mediatek MT8196 platform.


> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darren Ye <darren.ye at mediatek.com>
> > 
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +  - reg
> > > +  - interrupts
> > > +  - mediatek,vlpcksys
> > > +  - power-domains
> > > +  - memory-region
> > > +  - clocks
> > > +  - clock-names
> > 
> > 
> > Keep the same order as in properties:.
> 
> How did you implement this?
> 
I have already made the change here. The "required" fields have been
sorted according to the order of the properties.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> 
> How did you implement this?

Sorry, I got it now. I will add it to the commit.
> 
> 
> > 
> > <form letter>
> > This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review
> > tags
> > are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please
> > do
> > not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
> > intended).
> > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> > 
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> > versions
> > of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch
> > changed
> > significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag
> > is
> > "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the
> > mailing
> > list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to
> > repost
> > patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do
> > that for
> > tags received on the version they apply.
> > 
> > Full context and explanation:
> > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst*L577__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!l3YASE64DTMTp8bOMry9UyBMf-IcYFTvXOlP2DXfpeUEFdQK79xGYEnsxnJuMihVX7_WhEcicLV6xg$
> 
> How did you implement this?
Got it.

> 
> Does such questions help you to find what was missing?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof



I'm very sorry, this is my first time upstreaming. Thank you for your
patient guidance.

Best Regards,
Darren