[PATCH v3 7/7] of: of_cpu_phandle_to_id to support SMT threads
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Fri Jun 6 07:18:57 PDT 2025
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 09:07:15AM +0100, Alireza Sanaee wrote:
> Enhance the API to support SMT threads, this will allow sharing
> resources among multiple SMT threads.
>
> Enabled the sharing of resources, such as L1 Cache and clocks, between
> SMT threads. It introduces a fix that uses thread IDs to match each CPU
> thread in the register array within the cpu-node. This ensures that the
> cpu-map or any driver relying on this API is fine even when SMT threads
> share resources.
>
> Additionally, I have tested this for CPU based on the discussions in
> [1], I adopted the new cpu-map layout, where the first parameter is a
> phandle and the second is the local thread index, as shown below:
>
> core0 {
> thread0 {
> cpu = <&cpu0 0>;
> };
> thread1 {
> cpu = <&cpu0 1>;
> };
I think the thread nodes should be omitted in this case.
> };
>
> Also, there are devices such as below that are a bit different.
>
> arm_dsu at 0 {
> compatible = "arm,dsu";
> cpus = <&cpu0 &cpu1 &cpu2 &cpu3>;
> }
>
> In these cases, we can also point to a CPU thread as well like the
> following:
>
> arm_dsu at 0 {
> compatible = "arm,dsu";
> cpus = <&cpu0 5 &cpu1 9 &cpu2 1 &cpu3 0>;
The purpose of 'cpus' properties is to define CPU affinity. I don't
think the affinity could ever be different for threads in a core.
And cpu1 having 10 threads is nonsense.
Most cases of 'cpus' (and 'affinity') lookups and then callers of
of_cpu_node_to_id() ultimately just want to set a cpumask. So we should
provide that rather than opencoding the same loop everywhere.
> }
>
> It should be possible to know how many arguments a phandle might
> require, and this information is encoded in another variable in the dt
> called #cpu-cells in cpu node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee at huawei.com>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/devicetree-spec/CAL_JsqK1yqRLD9B+G7UUp=D8K++mXHq0Rmv=1i6DL_jXyZwXAw@mail.gmail.com/
> ---
> drivers/of/cpu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/cpu.c b/drivers/of/cpu.c
> index fba17994fc20..cf54ef47f029 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/cpu.c
> @@ -189,16 +189,41 @@ int of_cpu_phandle_to_id(const struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node **cpu_np,
> uint8_t cpu_idx)
> {
> + bool found = false;
> + int cpu, ret = -1, i, j;
> + uint32_t local_thread, thread_index;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + static const char * const phandle_names[] = { "cpus", "cpu" };
> + static const char * const cpu_cells[] = { "#cpu-cells", NULL };
> +
> if (!node)
> - return -1;
> + return ret;
>
> - *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
> - if (!*cpu_np)
> - *cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpus", cpu_idx);
> - if (!*cpu_np)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phandle_names); i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_cells); j++) {
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, phandle_names[i],
> + cpu_cells[j], cpu_idx,
> + &args);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + goto success;
> + }
> + }
>
> - return of_cpu_node_to_id(*cpu_np);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +success:
> + *cpu_np = args.np;
> + thread_index = args.args_count == 1 ? args.args[0] : 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, &local_thread);
> + found = (*cpu_np == np) && (local_thread == thread_index);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (found)
> + return cpu;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_phandle_to_id);
>
> @@ -206,7 +231,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_cpu_phandle_to_id);
> * of_get_cpu_state_node - Get CPU's idle state node at the given index
> *
> * @cpu_node: The device node for the CPU
> - * @index: The index in the list of the idle states
> +g* @index: The index in the list of the idle states
Oops!
> *
> * Two generic methods can be used to describe a CPU's idle states, either via
> * a flattened description through the "cpu-idle-states" binding or via the
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list