[v1] arm64: dts: freescale: imx93-var-som: update eqos support for MaxLinear PHY

[Stefano Radaelli]

Hi Andrew,

Absolutely, thanks again for pointing this out! I'm actually glad you asked,
because it pushed me to double-check internally with our hardware team
and confirm the exact implementation details.

I'll make sure to include a proper comment in the device tree right above the
'phy-mode = "rgmii";' line in v2, clearly stating that the RGMII delays are
handled via fixed passive components on the SOM's PCB itself, with no
software or strap-based configuration involved.

Thanks again,
Stefano

Il giorno mer 4 giu 2025 alle ore 17:13 Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch> ha scritto:
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 03:08:09PM +0200, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > To clarify more precisely: hw team told me that the required 2 ns
> > RGMII delays are
> > implemented directly in hardware inside the SOM itself, through passive delay
> > elements (filters) placed on the RX and TX lines. There is no reliance on PHY
> > strap settings or any kind of delay configuration via registers.
> >
> > This means:
> > - The delays are fixed and cannot be changed via software.
> > - From the point of view of any carrier board, the interface is
> > already timing-compliant.
>
> Great. Please add a comment in the DT explaining this. 99% of the time
> 'rgmii' is wrong, but this is the 1%. We should make it clear this is
> not just another cut/paste error, but very intentional and correct
> because of the PCB design.
>
> There is a patch to checkpatch.pl i want to introduce in the next
> development cycle which will look for 'rgmii', and if found, look on
> the line before for a comment including the word 'PCB'. If it finds
> 'rgmii' without such a comment it will issue a warning. So it would be
> nice to avoid that in your correct case.
>
>      Andrew