[PATCH v5 04/10] coresight: Appropriately disable programming clocks

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Tue Jul 29 04:31:35 PDT 2025


On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 05:45:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:
> 
> Previously we would return NULL for any error (which isn't super great
> for deferred probe but never mind).
> 
> > +	pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb_pclk");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pclk))
> > +		pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb");
> 
> ...
> 
> >  	return pclk;
> >  }
> 
> Now we pass errors back to the caller, making missing clocks fatal.

Thinking about this some more I think for compatiblity these clocks need
to be treated as optional - that's what the original code was
effectively doing, and I can imagine this isn't the only SoC which has
(hopefully) always on clocks and didn't wire things up in DT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250729/39853316/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list