[PATCH net-next v10 07/15] net: phy: Introduce generic SFP handling for PHY drivers

[Andrew Lunn]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 02:16:12PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> There are currently 4 PHY drivers that can drive downstream SFPs:
> marvell.c, marvell10g.c, at803x.c and marvell-88x2222.c. Most of the
> logic is boilerplate, either calling into generic phylib helpers (for
> SFP PHY attach, bus attach, etc.) or performing the same tasks with a
> bit of validation :
>  - Getting the module's expected interface mode
>  - Making sure the PHY supports it
>  - Optionnaly perform some configuration to make sure the PHY outputs

Too man n's.

> +static int phy_sfp_module_insert(void *upstream, const struct sfp_eeprom_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct phy_device *phydev = upstream;
> +	struct phy_port *port = phy_get_sfp_port(phydev);

Strictly speeding, this is not allowed, reverse Christmas tree...

The assignment needs to move into the body of the function.

> +	if (linkmode_empty(sfp_support)) {
> +		dev_err(&phydev->mdio.dev, "incompatible SFP module inserted\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	iface = sfp_select_interface(phydev->sfp_bus, sfp_support);
> +
> +	/* Check that this interface is supported */
> +	if (!test_bit(iface, port->interfaces)) {
> +		dev_err(&phydev->mdio.dev, "incompatible SFP module inserted\n");

Maybe make this string different to the previous one, so somebody
debugging issues knows which happened?

> +/**
> + * phy_get_sfp_port() - Returns the first valid SFP port of a PHY
> + * @phydev: pointer to the PHY device to get the SFP port from
> + *
> + * Returns: The first active SFP (serdes) port of a PHY device, NULL if none
> + * exist.
> + */
> +struct phy_port *phy_get_sfp_port(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	struct phy_port *port;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(port, &phydev->ports, head)
> +		if (port->active && port->is_mii)

Naming is hard, but this actually returns the first mii port.  Is
there a clear 1:1 mapping? I don't think i've ever seen it, but such a
SERDES port could be connected to a Ethernet switch? And when you get
further, add support for a MUX, could it be connected to a MUX?

	Andrew