[PATCH v8 2/2] memory: mtk-smi: mt8188: Add SMI reset and clamp for MT8188

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/07/2025 09:59, Friday Yang (杨阳) wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-07-24 at 09:08 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>
>>
>> On 24/07/2025 03:49, Friday Yang (杨阳) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 17:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
>>>> until
>>>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/05/2025 08:33, Friday Yang wrote:
>>>>> From: "Friday Yang" <friday.yang at mediatek.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> To prevent handling glitch signals during MTCMOS on/off
>>>>> transitions,
>>>>> SMI requires clamp and reset operations. Parse the reset
>>>>> settings
>>>>> for
>>>>> SMI LARBs and the clamp settings for the SMI Sub-Common.
>>>>> Register
>>>>> genpd callback for the SMI LARBs located in image, camera and
>>>>> IPE
>>>>> subsystems, and apply reset and clamp operations within the
>>>>> callback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Friday Yang <friday.yang at mediatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
>>>>> angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> You did not respond to previous review. Sending the same while
>>>> ignoring
>>>> previous review is obvious NAK.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Apologies for missing the message. In the v6 patch, I replaced
>>> 'pm_runtime_enable' with 'devm_pm_runtime_enable'. You pointed out
>>> that
>>> this change might alter the cleanup order and potentially introduce
>>> errors.
>>>
>>> v6:
>>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250408033206.12176-3-friday.yang@mediatek.com/
>>>
>>> Therefore, in the v7 patch, I reverted this change and continued
>>> using
>>> 'pm_runtime_enable' in the SMI driver. However, I did not include a
>>> clear description of the changes between v6 and v7 in the cover
>>> letter.
>>>
>>> v7:
>>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9f01a9a4-89b2-4bfc-97cd-827be989ef16@kernel.org/
>>>
>>> In the v8 patch, I have added a description in the cover letter.
>>> This series just add functions for SMI clamp and not change
>>> anything
>>> else. Is this acceptable to you?
>>
>> That was month ago. Nothing form this thread is in my memory, nothing
>> is
>> in the mailbox. There is no cover letter to find anymore.
>>
>> Anyway, you did not respond to the actual comment and you send the
>> same.
>> Now you respond... to something else still ignoring the comment about
>> fake tags.
>>
>> I will not be wasting more time on this patchset.
>>
> 
> Changes v7:
> - Remove the 'devm_pm_runtime_enable' change.
> 
> Above is the tag you ask. You are right, the 'devm_pm_runtime_enable'
> tag I mentionded in the patchset v6 is truly a fake tag. So please

This is a function. Not a tag. I asked about tag.

> ignore this tag. What I intended to explain here was that I decided not
> to use 'devm_pm_runtime_enable' to replace 'pm_runtime_enable'
> functions. Unfortunately, the fake tag didn't explain this clearly in
> the changelog, which was my fault. To address this, I updated patchset
> v8 to include an explanation.
> 
> In patchset v6, I replaced 'pm_runtime_enable' with
> 'devm_pm_runtime_enable'. However, in patchset v8, I reverted this
> change and included the reason for this decision in the changelog.
> Apologize for the delay and the trouble again.

Nothing above is related to my question about the
fake/invented/questioned tag.

Best regards,
Krzysztof