[PATCH v6 0/4] rust: Add bug/warn abstractions

FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomonori at gmail.com
Wed Jul 23 06:23:43 PDT 2025


On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:52:04 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com> wrote:

>> The patch for arm64? I tried to minimize changes to the original code
>> so not intentional.
> 
> The riscv one, i.e. from the range diff:
> 
>     @@ arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h: typedef u32 bug_insn_t;
>                 "2:\n\t"                                        \
>      -                  __BUG_ENTRY "\n\t"                      \
>      -                  ".org 2b + %3\n\t"                      \
>     --                  ".popsection"                           \
>      +          __BUG_ENTRY(file, line, flags) "\n\t"           \
>      +                  ".org 2b + " size "\n\t"                \
>     -+                  ".popsection\n"                         \
>     +                   ".popsection"                           \
>      +
>      +#define __BUG_FLAGS(flags)                                        \
>      +do {                                                              \
> 
> If you look into the `.popsection` line, your patch adds a newline,
> but I guess it was not intentional. In x86 there is a newline after
> the directive, but there we have `extra` afterwards.

Oops, indeed it's not intentional.

> (I noticed since I went to expand the macros in a dummy file, given it
> can be something tricky to spot differences in the normal diff, but it
> is visible in the normal diff.)
> 
>> Yeah, I followed the original code style.
> 
> And here I meant (i.e. the first part of that paragraph) that:
> 
>     -                    "\t.org 2b+%c1\n"                                  \
> 
> now generated those two spaces around it:
> 
>     +       "\t.org 2b + " size "\n"                                        \
> 

Ah, not intentional again.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list