Dead lock with clock global prepare_lock mutex and device's power.runtime_status
Miquel Raynal
miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Tue Jul 22 02:14:41 PDT 2025
Hello,
Thanks Chen-Yu for the heads up!
On 08/07/2025 at 01:28:08 +08, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 7:05 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 07.07.2025 18:58:16, Peng Fan wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 03:16:08AM +0000, Carlos Song wrote:
>> > >Hi, All:
>> > >
>> > >We met the dead lock issue recently and think it should be common issue and not sure how to fix it.
>> > >
>> > >We use gpio-gate-clock clock provider (drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c), gpio is one of i2c gpio expander (drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c). Our i2c driver enable run time pm (drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c [1]). System random blocked when at reboot.
>> > >
>> > >The dead lock happen as below call stacks
>> > >
>> > >Task 117 Task 120
>> > >
>> > >schedule()
>> > >clk_prepare_lock()--> wait prepare_lock(mutex_lock) schedule() wait for power.runtime_status exit RPM_SUSPENDING
>> > > ^^^^ A ^^^^ B
>> > >clk_bulk_unprepare() rpm_resume()
>> > >lpi2c_runtime_suspend() pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
>> > >... lpi2c_imx_xfer()
>> > > ...
>> > >rpm_suspend() set RPM_SUSPENDING pcf857x_set();
>> > > ^^^^ B ...
>> > > clk_prepare_lock() --> hold prepare_lock
>> > > ^^^^ A
>> > > ...
>> > >
>> >
>> > This is a common issue that clk use a big prepare lock which is easy
>> > to trigger dead lock with runtime pm. I recalled that pengutronix raised
>> > this, but could not find the information.
>>
>> Alexander Stein stumbled over this issue some time ago:
>>
>> | https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230421-kinfolk-glancing-e185fd9c47b4-mkl@pengutronix.de/
>>
>> I encountered it too, while trying to add a clock provider driver for a
>> SPI attached CAN controller which uses runtime pm.
>
> Miquel from Bootlin posted a more formal description of the problem and
> some possible solutions last year [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240527181928.4fc6b5f0@xps-13/
I also sent an RFC in April:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250326-cross-lock-dep-v1-0-3199e49e8652@bootlin.com/
I haven't got the energy yet to process the interesting feedback from
Rafael and Stephen. But getting a broader audience and maybe more
feedback will certainly help!
Thanks,
Miquèl
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list