[PATCH 3/3] staging: vchiq_arm: Make vchiq_shutdown never fail
Maíra Canal
mcanal at igalia.com
Sun Jul 13 11:46:26 PDT 2025
Hi Stefan,
On 11/07/25 12:40, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Most of the users of vchiq_shutdown ignore the return value,
> which is bad because this could lead to resource leaks.
> So instead of changing all calls to vchiq_shutdown, it's easier
> to make vchiq_shutdown never fail.
>
> Fixes: 71bad7f08641 ("staging: add bcm2708 vchiq driver")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst at gmx.net>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index 6434cbdc1a6e..721b15b7e13b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,7 @@ int vchiq_shutdown(struct vchiq_instance *instance)
If vchiq_shutdown() will always return 0 and most users ignore the
return value, how about turning it into a void function?
Best Regards,
- Maíra
> struct vchiq_state *state = instance->state;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (mutex_lock_killable(&state->mutex))
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + mutex_lock(&state->mutex);
>
> /* Remove all services */
> vchiq_shutdown_internal(state, instance);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list