[PATCH 3/3] staging: vchiq_arm: Make vchiq_shutdown never fail

Maíra Canal mcanal at igalia.com
Sun Jul 13 11:46:26 PDT 2025


Hi Stefan,

On 11/07/25 12:40, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Most of the users of vchiq_shutdown ignore the return value,
> which is bad because this could lead to resource leaks.
> So instead of changing all calls to vchiq_shutdown, it's easier
> to make vchiq_shutdown never fail.
> 
> Fixes: 71bad7f08641 ("staging: add bcm2708 vchiq driver")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst at gmx.net>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index 6434cbdc1a6e..721b15b7e13b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,7 @@ int vchiq_shutdown(struct vchiq_instance *instance)

If vchiq_shutdown() will always return 0 and most users ignore the
return value, how about turning it into a void function?

Best Regards,
- Maíra

>   	struct vchiq_state *state = instance->state;
>   	int ret = 0;
>   
> -	if (mutex_lock_killable(&state->mutex))
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> +	mutex_lock(&state->mutex);
>   
>   	/* Remove all services */
>   	vchiq_shutdown_internal(state, instance);




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list