[PATCH 4/9] gpio: regmap: add the .get_direction() callback
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Fri Jul 11 11:06:59 PDT 2025
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 7:45 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:43:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:09 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > This is not my area, so i will deffer to the GPIO
> > > Maintainers. However, it is not clear to me what get_direction()
> > > should return.
> >
> > This callback should return the current direction as set up
> > in the hardware.
> >
> > A major usecase is that this is called when the gpiochip is
> > registered to read out all the current directions of the GPIO
> > lines, so the kernel has a clear idea of the state of the
> > hardware.
> >
> > Calling this should ideally result in a read of the status from
> > a hardware register.
>
> O.K, so completely different to what is proposed in this patch.
>
> Maybe you can suggest a better name.
If the hardware only supports one direction, then .get_direction()
should return that direction.
What the patch does is to
read the direction from the hardware and use that in the
set_direction() callback, as if all regmapped hardware in the
world had fixed direction, that's wrong.
I'd just add something custom in gpio-regmap if this is
something reoccuring in regmapped GPIO drivers.
bool is_fixed_direction(struct gpio_regmap *gpio, unsigned int offset)
or so?
Then the core can use is_fixed_direction() together
with gpio_get_direction() to check if it can do
a certain set_direction().
Pseudocode:
mydir = get_direction(line)
if (is_fixed_direction(line) && (mydir != requested_dir)
return -ERROR;
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list