[PATCH net-next v10 02/11] net: ti: prueth: Adds ICSSM Ethernet driver

Parvathi Pudi parvathi at couthit.com
Fri Jul 11 05:25:32 PDT 2025


Hi,

> On Wed,  2 Jul 2025 19:36:24 +0530 Parvathi Pudi wrote:
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "%pOF error reading port_id %d\n",
>> +				eth_node, ret);
>> +		}
> 
> unnecessary parenthesis, but also did you mean to error out here?
> 

Yes, we will address this in the next version.

>> +			dev_err(dev, "port reg should be 0 or 1\n");
>> +			of_node_put(eth_node);
> 
> this error will also trigger if same port is specified multiple times
> 

We will check and add appropriate code changes in the next version.

> +			ret = PTR_ERR(prueth->pru1);
> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(dev, "unable to get PRU1: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto put_pru;
> 
> dev_err_probe() ?
> 

Sure, we will replace “dev_err()” with “dev_err_probe()” to make it
simple.

>> +/**
>> + * struct prueth_private_data - PRU Ethernet private data
>> + * @fw_pru: firmware names to be used for PRUSS ethernet usecases
>> + * @support_lre: boolean to indicate if lre is enabled
>> + * @support_switch: boolean to indicate if switch is enabled
> 
> Please improve or remove this, adding kdoc which doesn't explain
> anything is discouraged per kernel coding style.
> 
> This one is actually more confusing than helpful the fields are
> called "support" but kdoc says "enabled". Maybe name the fields
> 'enabled' ?
> 

Sure, we will address this in the next version.

>> + */
>> +struct prueth_private_data {
>> +	const struct prueth_firmware fw_pru[PRUSS_NUM_PRUS];
>> +	bool support_lre;
>> +	bool support_switch;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* data for each emac port */
>> +struct prueth_emac {
>> +	struct prueth *prueth;
>> +	struct net_device *ndev;
>> +
>> +	struct rproc *pru;
>> +	struct phy_device *phydev;
>> +
>> +	int link;
>> +	int speed;
>> +	int duplex;
>> +
>> +	enum prueth_port port_id;
>> +	const char *phy_id;
>> +	u8 mac_addr[6];
>> +	phy_interface_t phy_if;
>> +	spinlock_t lock;	/* serialize access */
> 
> 'serialize access' to what? Which fields does it protect?

We will update with more detailed explanation.


Thanks and Regards,
Parvathi.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list