[PATCH] KVM: arm64: fix u64_replace_bits() usage
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Fri Jul 11 02:13:48 PDT 2025
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:53:41AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> > Yes, as far as I can tell, the warning only showed up in linux-next
> > after f66f9c3d09c1 ("bitfield: Ensure the return values of helper
> > functions are checked").
> > As far as I can tell, Ben added the check in linux/bitfield.h
> > when he sent you his version of the fix, they just ended up
> > in linux-next in the wrong order, so I ended up recreating his
> > original fix slightly differently.
> I don't think Ben's fix is in -next, as I queued it in the kvmarm
> fixes branch, which isn't pulled by -next.
We should really get that added to -next, that'll ensure it gets covered
in the pending-fixes testing coverage and avoid issues like this with
the main -next tree.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250711/a3bc4a96/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list