[PATCH v2 08/12] pinctrl: qcom: use generic pin function helpers

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 7/9/25 4:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski at linaro.org>
> 
> Use the existing infrastructure for storing and looking up pin functions
> in pinctrl core. Remove hand-crafted callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski at linaro.org>
> ---

[...]

>  int msm_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		      const struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data *soc_data)
>  {
> +	const struct pinfunction *func;
>  	struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl;
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1606,6 +1581,14 @@ int msm_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		return PTR_ERR(pctrl->pctrl);
>  	}
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < soc_data->nfunctions; i++) {
> +		func = &soc_data->functions[i];
> +
> +		ret = pinmux_generic_add_pinfunction(pctrl->pctrl, func, NULL);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}

It's good in principle, but we're now going to house two copies of
the function data in memory... Can we trust __initconst nowadays?

Konrad