[PATCH v3 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for i.MX95
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Wed Jul 9 07:31:48 PDT 2025
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 03:49:40PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:39:55AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:23:29AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >>
> >> Add imx_rproc_cfg_imx95_m7 and address(TCM and DDR) mapping.
> >> Add i.MX95 of_device_id entry.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta at nxp.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> >> index b1a117ca5e5795554b67eb7092db2a25fc7de13b..c226f78c84ad180c69804116d6cfcab19db6aaa5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> >> @@ -73,6 +73,10 @@
> >>
> >> #define IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED 5
> >>
> >> +/* Must align with System Manager Firmware */
> >> +#define IMX95_M7_CPUID 1
> >> +#define IMX95_M7_LMID 1
> >
> >Any reason those aren't set in the device tree?
>
> Krzysztof rejected to introduce the IDs to devicetree.
>
> From IRC:
> "To me this makes no sense in current explanayton - you have 8 cores, but only
> one can be put there, so what happens with the rest?
> And I don't think we care about something like remote and local ID - it is
> the same. CPUs have single number. So this looks like copy paste downstream
> and thus solve it internally first"
>
>
> In System Manager Firmware, CPUID is fixed and will not change.
> LMID is also fixed as of now, we not expect customer to change LMID.
>
> So with "fsl,imx95-m7", we could know the CPUID and LMID for M7, so
> it does not make sense to introduce new property saying "fsl,imx95-lmid"
> and "fsl,imx95-cpuid". This should be the main concern that DT maintainers
> reject to add properties for the IDs.
>
Ok
> Thanks,
> Peng
>
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mathieu
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list