[PATCH v2 03/32] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: use clk_parent_data

Claudiu Beznea claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev
Mon Jul 7 06:21:48 PDT 2025


Hi, Ryan,

On 24.06.2025 18:08, Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
> 
> Use struct clk_parent_data instead of struct parent_hw as this leads
> to less usage of __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific clock drivers and simpler
> conversion of existing SoC specific clock drivers from parent_names to
> modern clk_parent_data structures. As clk-sam9x60-pll need to know
> parent's rate at initialization we pass it now from SoC specific drivers.
> This will lead in the end at removing __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific
> drivers (that will be solved by subsequent commits).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
> [ryan.wanner at microchip.com: Remove SoC specific driver changes, those
> will be added in subsequent commits.]

With this, series is not bisectable.

Also, building this patch throws:

../drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c: In function ‘sama7g5_pmc_setup’:
../drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c:1054:12: warning: passing argument 5 of
‘sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
[-Wint-conversion]
 1054 |      NULL, parent_hw, i,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~
      |            |
      |            struct clk_hw *
In file included from ../drivers/clk/at91/sama7g5.c:17:
../drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h:260:24: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but
argument is of type ‘struct clk_hw *’
  260 |          unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c: In function ‘sama7d65_pmc_setup’:
../drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c:1175:12: warning: passing argument 5 of
‘sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
[-Wint-conversion]
 1175 |      NULL, parent_hw, i,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~
      |            |
      |            struct clk_hw *
In file included from ../drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c:16:
../drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h:260:24: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but
argument is of type ‘struct clk_hw *’
  260 |          unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
  AR      drivers/clk/at91/built-in.a


Same for the rest of patches in this series following the "Remove SoC
specific driver changes" approach.

> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 14 +++++---------
>  drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h             |  5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index cefd9948e103..03a7d00dcc6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -630,19 +630,19 @@ static const struct clk_ops sam9x60_fixed_div_pll_ops = {
>  
>  struct clk_hw * __init
>  sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> -			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> -			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
> +			      const char *name, const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
> +			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	struct sam9x60_frac *frac;
>  	struct clk_hw *hw;
>  	struct clk_init_data init = {};
> -	unsigned long parent_rate, irqflags;
> +	unsigned long irqflags;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_hw)
> +	if (id > PLL_MAX_ID || !lock || !parent_data)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>  	frac = kzalloc(sizeof(*frac), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -650,10 +650,7 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	init.name = name;
> -	if (parent_name)
> -		init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> -	else
> -		init.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw **)&parent_hw;
> +	init.parent_data = (const struct clk_parent_data *)parent_data;
>  	init.num_parents = 1;
>  	if (flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE)
>  		init.ops = &sam9x60_frac_pll_ops;
> @@ -684,7 +681,6 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  		 * its rate leading to enabling this PLL with unsupported
>  		 * rate. This will lead to PLL not being locked at all.
>  		 */
> -		parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent_hw);
>  		if (!parent_rate) {
>  			hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  			goto free;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> index 63d4c425bed5..b43f6652417f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h
> @@ -255,8 +255,9 @@ sam9x60_clk_register_div_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
>  
>  struct clk_hw * __init
>  sam9x60_clk_register_frac_pll(struct regmap *regmap, spinlock_t *lock,
> -			      const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> -			      struct clk_hw *parent_hw, u8 id,
> +			      const char *name,
> +			      const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
> +			      unsigned long parent_rate, u8 id,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_characteristics *characteristics,
>  			      const struct clk_pll_layout *layout, u32 flags);
>  




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list