[PATCH v2 3/4] kselftest/arm64: Add a test for vfork() with GCS

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 11:39:14AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 01:29:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > +		exit(ret);

> Should this be _exit() instead? IIRC exit() does some clean-ups which
> are not safe in the vfork'ed child.

This test is written to nolibc so that we don't get any of that libc
level stuff, but yeah it would be a bit more correct.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250703/ea2f3126/attachment.sig>