[PATCH v3 17/24] driver core: Export get_dev_from_fwnode()

[Danilo Krummrich]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 12:26 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:34:12AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:47:19PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > It has turned out get_dev_from_fwnode() is useful at a few other places
> > > > outside of the driver core, as in gpiolib.c for example. Therefore let's
> > > > make it available as a common helper function.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak at google.com>
> > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco at toradex.com> # Colibri iMX8X
> > > > Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ideasonboard.com> # TI AM62A,Xilinx ZynqMP ZCU106
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/base/core.c    | 8 ++++++--
> > > >  include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned about exporting get_dev_from_fwnode() -- at least without a
> > clear note on that this helper should be used with caution.
> >
> > AFAIK, a struct fwnode_handle instance does not have a reference count for its
> > struct device pointer.
> >
> > Hence, calling get_dev_from_fwnode() with a valid fwnode handle is not enough.
> 
> Not enough for what?

Having a valid pointer to a fwnode does not guarantee that fwnode->dev is a
valid pointer. Given that fwnode is reference counted itself, but only has a
weak reference of the device behind fwnode->dev, the device may have been
released already.

If the scope this function is called from can't guarantee that fwnode->dev has
not been released yet, it's a potential UAF.

Yes, device_del() sets dev->fwnode->dev = NULL. But that makes it still racy.

If someone has a reference count on the fwnode and calls get_dev_from_fwnode()
while device_del() runs concurrently (assuming that device_del() drops the last
reference of the device), it's a race with a potential UAF.

We should warn about this, when makeing get_dev_from_fwnode() and API that can
be used by *everyone*.

- Danilo