[PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: dts: bst: add support for Black Sesame Technologies C1200 CDCU1.0 board and defconfig
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Jul 2 05:15:13 PDT 2025
On 2025-07-02 10:44 am, Albert Yang wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/bst/bstc1200.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/bst/bstc1200.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ddff2cb82cb0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/bst/bstc1200.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + compatible = "bst,c1200";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu at 0 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a78";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
> + reg = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu at 1 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a78";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu at 2 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a78";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
> + reg = <0x200>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu at 3 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a78";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
> + reg = <0x300>;
> + };
> +
> + l2_cache: l2-cache-1 {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + cache-unified;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + clk_mmc: clock-4000000 {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <4000000>;
> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + always-on;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
Your PPIs target 8 of the 4 CPUS? Either way you don't have GICv2,
please use the GICv3 binding.
> + };
> +
> + soc: soc at 0 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff 0xffffffff>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> + mmc0: mmc at 22200000 {
> + compatible = "bst,c1200-dwcmshc-sdhci";
> + reg = <0x0 0x22200000 0x0 0x1000>,
> + <0x0 0x23006000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 144 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk_mmc>;
> + clock-names = "core";
> + max-frequency = <200000000>;
> + bus-width = <8>;
> + non-removable;
> + dma-coherent;
Given the funky DMA setup, I can't help be mildly suspicious of this -
is the device genuinely I/O coherent and capable of snooping the CPU
caches, or are you only getting away with it because
dma_init_coherent_memory() happens to remap as non-cacheable regardless?
Thanks,
Robin.
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + uart0: serial at 20008000 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> + reg = <0x0 0x20008000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 211 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clock-frequency = <25000000>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller at 32800000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + ranges;
> + reg = <0x0 0x32800000 0x0 0x10000>,
> + <0x0 0x32880000 0x0 0x100000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> + method = "smc";
> + };
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 897fc686e6a9..0a1cfaa19688 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_BCMBCA=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_BRCMSTB=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_BERLIN=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_BLAIZE=y
> +CONFIG_ARCH_BST=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_SPARX5=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_K3=y
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list