[PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions

[Alexei Starovoitov]

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index da729cbbaeb9..ab082ab9d535 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -1663,14 +1663,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_call_base);
>         INSN_3(JMP, JSET, K),                   \
>         INSN_2(JMP, JA),                        \
>         INSN_2(JMP32, JA),                      \
> +       /* Atomic operations. */                \
> +       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, B),                 \
> +       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, H),                 \
> +       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, W),                 \
> +       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, DW),                \
>         /* Store instructions. */               \
>         /*   Register based. */                 \
>         INSN_3(STX, MEM,  B),                   \
>         INSN_3(STX, MEM,  H),                   \
>         INSN_3(STX, MEM,  W),                   \
>         INSN_3(STX, MEM,  DW),                  \
> -       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, W),                 \
> -       INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, DW),                \
>         /*   Immediate based. */                \
>         INSN_3(ST, MEM, B),                     \
>         INSN_3(ST, MEM, H),                     \
> @@ -2169,6 +2172,8 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
>
>         STX_ATOMIC_DW:
>         STX_ATOMIC_W:
> +       STX_ATOMIC_H:
> +       STX_ATOMIC_B:
>                 switch (IMM) {
>                 ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BPF_ADD, add)
>                 ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BPF_AND, and)

STX_ATOMI_[BH] looks wrong.
It will do atomic64_*() ops in wrong size.
BPF_INSN_MAP() applies to bpf_opcode_in_insntable()
and the verifier will allow such new insns.