[PATCH v10 04/10] arm64/sysreg: Add a comment that the sysreg file should be sorted

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:49 AM Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:43:39 +0000,
> James Clark <james.clark at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/01/2025 12:49 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 11:32:41 +0000,
> > > James Clark <james.clark at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> From: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>
> > >>
> > >> There are a few entries particularly at the end of the file that aren't
> > >> in order. To avoid confusion, add a comment that might help new entries
> > >> to be added in the right place.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> > >> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark at linaro.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>   arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 2 ++
> > >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> > >> index b081b54d6d22..4ba167089e2a 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> > >> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> > >>   # feature that introduces them (eg, FEAT_LS64_ACCDATA introduces enumeration
> > >>   # item ACCDATA) though it may be more taseful to do something else.
> > >>   +# Please try to keep entries in this file sorted by sysreg
> > >> encoding.
> > >> +
> > >>   Sysreg   OSDTRRX_EL1     2       0       0       0       2
> > >>   Res0     63:32
> > >>   Field    31:0    DTRRX
> > >
> > > "Do as I say, don't do as I do".
> > >
> > > I don't think this makes any sense if we don't actually sort the file
> > > the first place.
> > >
> > >     M.
> > >
> >
> > I think it's ok if it avoids review comments that new entries should
> > be sorted. Or maybe we do the opposite and the comment should say this
> > file is allowed to be unsorted...
>
> The better option would be to add the comment *and* sort the file.
> Leading by example has some value, it seems.

IME, it's better if documentation just states what the tools enforce.

Can't we add something like this to the header generation:

$ grep '^Sysreg\s' arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | sort -n -k3 -k4 -k5 -k6 -k7 -c
sort: -:22: disorder: Sysreg ID_MMFR4_EL1       3       0       0
 2       6

Rob