[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add NetCube Systems Austria name

[Lukas Schmid]

Am 2025-01-02 19:31, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 02/01/2025 19:24, Lukas Schmid wrote:
>> Am 2025-01-02 18:57, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>>> On 02/01/2025 18:49, Lukas Schmid wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmid <lukas.schmid at netcube.li>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
>>> 
>>> You did not read really the messages we gave you...
>>> 
>>> 1. Read what I wrote in my first reply for v1. I gave detailed
>>> instruction to avoid the exact mistake you now did.
>>> 
>>> 2. Read again Andre's reply.
>>> 
>>> 3. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
>>> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox 
>>> and
>>> might interfere with applying entire sets.
>>> 
>>> 4. Next version, with proper cover letter, is after 24h, so you have
>>> some time to digest the feedback.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for the 
>> mistakes
>> in my submission process.
>> 
>> I did read Andre's reply and your feedback on v1, but unfortunately, I
>> had already sent the v2 series as a reply before fully understanding 
>> all
>> the recommendations. I realize now that this was a misstep and caused
>> confusion.
>> 
>> I will wait until tomorrow, around 20:00, to send the v3 series. I 
>> will
>> make sure to include a proper cover letter and ensure that all the
>> feedback from v1 and v2 is addressed.
>> 
>> Regarding the v1 feedback, I thought I had incorporated all your
>> suggestions. However, after rereading it, I seem to have missed
>> something critical. Could you please point out what I might have
>> overlooked? I want to make sure I fully understand and correct it in 
>> the
>> next iteration.
>> 
> Please read my full reply for v1 of this patch. How did you implement
> that feedback - long instruction?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

I assume by 'long instruction' you mean checking the devicetree using
'make dtbs_check W=1'.

I did run dtbs_check after already applying some of the changes you had
recommended. I just had a look at it's output again, and see now that 
there
is one more issue about 'pinctrl at 1c20800: 'gpio-reserved-ranges' does 
not
match any of the regexes'.

Is this what you mean?

If thats the case I'd assume I should add another patch which adds the
'gpio-reserved-ranges' property to the
'devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sun4i-a10-pinctrl.yaml' file.

Best regards,
Lukas