[PATCH 05/18] KVM: arm64: Don't treat HCRX_EL2 as a FGT register

[Marc Zyngier]

Treating HCRX_EL2 as yet another FGT register seems excessive, and
gets in a way of further improvements. It is actually simpler to
just be explicit about the masking, so just to that.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index f838a45665f26..25a7ff5012ed6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -261,12 +261,9 @@ static inline void __activate_traps_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) {
 		u64 hcrx = vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2;
 		if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && !is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) {
-			u64 clr = 0, set = 0;
-
-			compute_clr_set(vcpu, HCRX_EL2, clr, set);
-
-			hcrx |= set;
-			hcrx &= ~clr;
+			u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCRX_EL2);
+			hcrx |= val & __HCRX_EL2_MASK;
+			hcrx &= ~(~val & __HCRX_EL2_nMASK);
 		}
 
 		write_sysreg_s(hcrx, SYS_HCRX_EL2);
-- 
2.39.2