[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pxa: Use #pwm-cells = <3>

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> this series' goal is to soften the special device-tree binding of
> marvel,pxa-pwm devices. This is the only binding that doesn't pass the
> line index as first parameter.
> 
> Here the #pwm-cells value is bumped from 1 to 3, keeping compatibility
> with the old binding.
> 
> The motivation for this was that Hervé sent a patch introducing pwm
> nexus nodes which don't work nicely with the marvel,pxa-pwm
> particularities.
> 
> Changes since (implicit) v1, available at
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/cover.1738777221.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com:
> 
>  - Use #pwm-cells = <3> also in the binding example (*sigh*), pointed
>    out by Rob
>  - Add review, ack and test tags by Hervé Codina, Conor Dooley, Duje
>    Mihanović and Daniel Mack. Thanks!
> 
> I intend to take the first patch via my pwm tree. Assuming the pxa and
> device tree maintainers and bots are happy now: Dear pxa maintainers,
> please tell if I should take the whole series via pwm, or if you want to
> take patches #2 and #3. If the latter: Do you want to delay application
> or should I provide an immutable branch for patch #1?

I applied patch #1 to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
now.

I don't know yet what should happen to the two other patches, but maybe
it's a good idea to wait a bit anyhow to have 3 cells working for the
pxa driver for a kernel release or two before we switch it.

Best regards
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250210/a3a79726/attachment.sig>