[PATCH] dt-bindings: ARM: at91: add Calao USB boards

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 05:27:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> They have not been added so far. dtbs_check complains loudly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas at sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> index 0ec29366e6c2..42469a054a60 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ properties:
>            - const: atmel,at91rm9200
>        - items:
>            - enum:
> +              - calao,usb-a9260
> +              - calao,usb-a9263
> +              - calao,usb-a9g20

I don't undertstand why calao,usb-a9g20 or existing olimex,sam9-l9260
can be fitted with any SoC.  If that's expected, mention in commit msg.
If not, then this needs to be fixed, not grew.


>                - olimex,sam9-l9260
>            - enum:
>                - atmel,at91sam9260
> @@ -35,6 +38,11 @@ properties:
>                - atmel,at91sam9xe
>                - atmel,at91sam9x60
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9

Line break.

> +      - items:
> +          - const: calao,usb-a9g20-lpw
> +          - const: calao,usb-a9g20
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9g20
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9

Best regards,
Krzysztof