[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: airoha: Add the pbus-csr node for EN7581 SoC
Lorenzo Bianconi
lorenzo at kernel.org
Sat Feb 1 04:16:52 PST 2025
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 06:32:30PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > This patch adds the pbus-csr document bindings for EN7581 SoC.
>
> Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
> longer explanation here:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
ack, I will fix it in v2
>
> > The airoha pbus-csr block provides a configuration interface for the
> > PBUS controller used to detect if a given address is on PCIE0, PCIE1 or
> > PCIE2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo at kernel.org>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/arm/airoha,en7581-pbus-csr.yaml | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/airoha,en7581-pbus-csr.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/airoha,en7581-pbus-csr.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80b237e195cd3607645efe3fda1eb6152134481c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/airoha,en7581-pbus-csr.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/airoha,en7581-pbus-csr.yaml#
>
> arm is only top level bindings and ARM stuff. This is soc.
in this case we should create an airoha folder in
'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc', correct?
>
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Airoha Pbus CSR Controller for EN7581 SoC
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo at kernel.org>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + The airoha pbus-csr block provides a configuration interface for the PBUS
> > + controller used to detect if a given address is on PCIE0, PCIE1 or PCIE2.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - airoha,en7581-pbus-csr
>
> Does not fit standard syscon bindings?
I think standard syscon is fine. In this case we could drop this patch. Agree?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250201/ae8d278f/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list