[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: Add support for mt8196
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Thu Feb 27 23:16:17 PST 2025
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:11:41AM +0000, Cathy Xu (许华婷) wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 20:26 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:16:25 +0800, Cathy Xu wrote:
> > > Add the new binding document for pinctrl on MediaTek mt8196.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu at mediatek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cathy Xu <ot_cathy.xu at mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-pinctrl.yaml | 241
> > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-
> > > pinctrl.yaml
> > >
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>
> Sorry, this patch depond on another patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250228011702.16493-3-ot_cathy.xu@mediatek.com/
> In this case, does the dt-binding still need go first? If so, I
This means your series are non-bisectable but even re-ordering will nto
fix it. You understand you target different trees?
> will include the dependency information in the commit message of
> the next version. Thank you~
No, decouple from dependencies.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list