[PATCH v5 04/10] hyperv: Introduce hv_recommend_using_aeoi()
Easwar Hariharan
eahariha at linux.microsoft.com
Thu Feb 27 15:03:22 PST 2025
On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
> partition code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves at linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/hv/hv.c | 12 +-----------
> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> index 258034dfd829..1f46d19a16aa 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 control, u64 input1, u64 input2);
> bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
> bool hv_isolation_type_tdx(void);
>
> +/*
> + * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
> + * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
> + */
> +static inline bool hv_recommend_using_aeoi(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
> + return !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
I must be missing something very basic here, and if so, I apologize, and please enlighten me.
HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is defined as BIT(9) in include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h, and
asm-generic/mshyperv.h includes that via include/hyperv/hvhdk.h.
If this is the case, when would HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED ever be not defined?
If it's always defined, do we need the #ifdef?
Thanks,
Easwar (he/him)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list