[PATCH] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix broken USB on Exynos5422 (TYPEC dependency)

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 27/02/2025 06:56, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 15-02-25, 10:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Can you revise the title to "phy: exynos5-usbdrd: dont depend on type-c"
> or something relevenant which describes the change rather than the
> Fix something!

Sure, it won't change the fact that we are fixing broken USB dependency.

> 
>> Older Exynos designs, like Exynos5422, do not have USB Type-C and the
>> USB DRD PHY does not really depend on Type-C for these devices at all.
>> Incorrectly added dependency on CONFIG_TYPEC caused this driver to be
>> missing for exynos_defconfig and as result Exynos5422-based boards like
>> Hardkernel Odroid HC1 failed to probe USB.
>>
>> Drop incorrect dependency and rely on module to be reachable by the
>> compiler.
> 
> Changelog lgtm
> 
>>
>> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/6139
>> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3c0b77e6-357d-453e-8b63-4757c3231bde@samsung.com/
>> Fixes: 09dc674295a3 ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: subscribe to orientation notifier if required")
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch for issue in linux-next
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig              | 1 -
>>  drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> index 7fba571c0e2b..e2330b0894d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig
>> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>>  	tristate "Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY driver"
>>  	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && OF) || COMPILE_TEST
>>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
>> -	depends on TYPEC || (TYPEC=n && COMPILE_TEST)
> 
> So how would this dependency be sorted..?

That was a v1 and new versions are on the lists with simpler approach.

> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof