[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable HSR driver
Malladi, Meghana
m-malladi at ti.com
Wed Feb 26 21:43:22 PST 2025
On 2/26/2025 5:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/02/2025 12: 54, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On
> 2/26/2025 4: 18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/02/2025 11: 44,
> Malladi, Meghana wrote: > > > On 2/26/2025 1: 35 >> PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
> of this email and know the content is safe.
> Report Suspicious
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK!
> updgPX1FFo0b4GXEXdPDfwTBSgIATJM2ZirviWBzo9UAByA7dipk7rbevgVn7EQb6-
> DBhdHMpW7WhdxsrgH8RrHp6HnyASM$>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> On 26/02/2025 12:54, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 2/26/2025 4:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 26/02/2025 11: 44, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > > > On 2/26/2025 1: 35
>>> PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/02/2025 07: 18, Malladi, Meghana
>>> wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies in >> case you are receiving this email
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
>>> of this email and know the content is safe.
>>> Report Suspicious
>>> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK!
>>> updq3RaPV007wGXFFrPD30z5a3GGYjpJweyhUcIfUTTaUs-8q0QpC4Yk9azBiFp7cBAf2Knk6fnVs4Fs-zRjTMEn8kmpiGo$>
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>>
>>> On 26/02/2025 11:44, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/26/2025 1:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 26/02/2025 07: 18, Malladi, Meghana wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies in
>>>>> case you are receiving this email for the second time. > Any reason why
>>>>> this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing > this to the
>>>>> tip, anything
>>>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>>>> This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
>>>>> of this email and know the content is safe.
>>>>> Report Suspicious
>>>>> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK!
>>>>> updgnZav1ue7gKXOnHOpH5hg8gLmw9Osqsqh-
>>>>> KTLRTnBEurV_VetrG7mzU898vB_5xFrYgbRkkuuFMBobM-uhFAmUgccRSk$>
>>>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/02/2025 07:18, Malladi, Meghana wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apologies in case you are receiving this email for the second time.
>>>
>>> BTW, Arnd when responded with Ack described the process.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I wanted to re-confirm before posting it again (just in case).
>>
>>>>>> Any reason why this patch hasn't been merged yet. Other than re-basing
>>>>>> this to the tip, anything else which needs to be addressed to get this
>>>>>> merged?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you sent it to your platform maintainers, so no one would
>>>>> apply it. Usually people ignore emails they did not receive, although I
>>>>> am here an exception tracking missing-DT-patchwork things... :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Arnd/Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the replies :)
>>>> Was having ambiguity since this is not TI specific change. Wanted to
>>>> confirm before re-posting. Will post v2 patch including TI platform
>>>> maintainers.
>>>
>>> It is not TI specific? Then which upstream boards benefit from this if
>>> not TI?
>>>
>>
>> This change enables generic HSR protocol support in the kernel which is
>> required for HSR driver support in TI boards. When I said "not TI
>> specific" - I meant this change is not internal to TI driver. Hope this
>> clarifies the miscommunication from my earlier mail.
>
> Yes, sure, but this defconfig change benefits and is sent for certain TI
> upstream boards, so it is TI upstream maintainers field. It still fits
> the "Submitting Patches for Given SoC" in SoC maintainer profile.
>
Okay, I got your point now. So as long as this defconfig benefits TI
SoCs, it should be sent with maintainer profile. I will keep that in
mind for future patches as well. Thanks for clarifying this.
Best Regards,
Meghana
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list