[PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Fri Feb 21 07:35:02 PST 2025
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 07:10:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Will, Ryan,
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:13PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> > This series contains some fixes for hugetlb on arm64, and is split out from v1
> > of a wider series at [1]. While the last patch is technically targetting core-mm
> > and is not directly related to arm64, I'd like to to go via the arm64 tree so
> > that the wider performance improvement series (v2 to be posted shortly) that
> > depends on this series doesn't have to be robust to the fix not being present.
> >
> > I've included maintainers/reviewers for all the arches that are (trivially)
> > touched due to the API changes, hoping for some ACKs.
>
> These fixes look fine to me and I think we should get them in for 6.14.
> I think Andrew was ok with them going in via the arm64 tree:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250205235219.3c3a4b968087d1386d708b04@linux-foundation.org/
I think the diffstat looks worse than it really is, as the arch changes
are reasonably mechanical. I'd like to let it sit in next for a few days
though, so I'll pick this up once we've resolved my comment on patch #2.
Ryan -- did you find all of these issues by inspection, or are you aware
of anybody hitting them in practice?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list