[PATCH v5 06/10] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: Enable IPC with remote processors

Judith Mendez jm at ti.com
Tue Feb 18 09:51:48 PST 2025


Hi Andrew,


On 2/18/25 10:38 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 2/10/25 4:15 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> From: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht at ti.com>
>>
>> For each remote proc, reserve memory for IPC and bind the mailbox
>> assignments. Two memory regions are reserved for each remote processor.
>> The first region of 1MB of memory is used for Vring shared buffers
>> and the second region is used as external memory to the remote processor
>> for the resource table and for tracebuffer allocations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm at ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v4:
>> - Drop SRAM node for am62px MCU R5fSS0 core0
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts
>> index ad71d2f27f538..9609727d042d3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts
>> @@ -48,6 +48,30 @@ reserved-memory {
>>           #size-cells = <2>;
>>           ranges;
>> +        mcu_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: 
>> mcu-r5fss-dma-memory-region at 9b800000 {
>> +            compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +            reg = <0x00 0x9b800000 0x00 0x100000>;
>> +            no-map;
>> +        };
>> +
>> +        mcu_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: 
>> mcu-r5fss-memory-region at 9b900000 {
>> +            compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +            reg = <0x00 0x9b900000 0x00 0xf00000>;
>> +            no-map;
>> +        };
>> +
>> +        wkup_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory at 9c800000 {
>> +            compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +            reg = <0x00 0x9c800000 0x00 0x100000>;
>> +            no-map;
>> +        };
>> +
>> +        wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory at 9c900000 {
>> +            compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +            reg = <0x00 0x9c900000 0x00 0x1e00000>;
> 
> 0x1e00000?
> 
> Yes I know you didn't add this and are just coping it from below, but it
> is still an issue. I see the same problem for the next patch, the R5F 
> memory
> size is 0xc00000??
> 
> Every remote core gets 15MB (0xf00000), this has been true for all K3, and
> all cores, DSP, R5F, M4, etc.. You even do it correct for the MCU R5F 
> above,
> but the WKUP R5F on AM62P and AM62 are just randomly given 30M and 12MB?

Not sure why FW requires 30MB here, I have reached out to FW team to
investigate this, will respond back here soon.

~ Judith

> 
> Andrew
> 
>> +            no-map;
>> +        };
>> +
>>           secure_tfa_ddr: tfa at 9e780000 {
>>               reg = <0x00 0x9e780000 0x00 0x80000>;
>>               no-map;
>> @@ -57,12 +81,6 @@ secure_ddr: optee at 9e800000 {
>>               reg = <0x00 0x9e800000 0x00 0x01800000>; /* for OP-TEE */
>>               no-map;
>>           };
>> -
>> -        wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory at 9c900000 {
>> -            compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> -            reg = <0x00 0x9c900000 0x00 0x01e00000>;
>> -            no-map;
>> -        };
>>       };
>>       vmain_pd: regulator-0 {
>> @@ -638,6 +656,26 @@ mbox_mcu_r5_0: mbox-mcu-r5-0 {
>>       };
>>   };
>> +&wkup_r5fss0 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&wkup_r5fss0_core0 {
>> +    mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster0 &mbox_r5_0>;
>> +    memory-region = <&wkup_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
>> +            <&wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mcu_r5fss0 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mcu_r5fss0_core0 {
>> +    mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster1 &mbox_mcu_r5_0>;
>> +    memory-region = <&mcu_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
>> +            <&mcu_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
>> +};
>> +
>>   &main_uart0 {
>>       pinctrl-names = "default";
>>       pinctrl-0 = <&main_uart0_pins_default>;




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list