[PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree bindings
Swathi K S
swathi.ks at samsung.com
Thu Feb 13 20:53:49 PST 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> Sent: 13 February 2025 17:31
> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>
> Cc: krzk+dt at kernel.org; andrew+netdev at lunn.ch; davem at davemloft.net;
> edumazet at google.com; kuba at kernel.org; pabeni at redhat.com;
> robh at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org; richardcochran at gmail.com;
> mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com; alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com;
> rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk; netdev at vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
> bindings
>
> On 13/02/2025 12:04, Swathi K S wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 13 February 2025 13:24
> >> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks at samsung.com>
> >> Cc: krzk+dt at kernel.org; andrew+netdev at lunn.ch;
> davem at davemloft.net;
> >> edumazet at google.com; kuba at kernel.org; pabeni at redhat.com;
> >> robh at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org; richardcochran at gmail.com;
> >> mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com; alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com;
> >> rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk; netdev at vger.kernel.org;
> >> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32 at st-md-
> mailman.stormreply.com;
> >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device
> >> tree bindings
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:16:23AM +0530, Swathi K S wrote:
> >>> + clock-names:
> >>> + minItems: 5
> >>> + maxItems: 10
> >>> + contains:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - ptp_ref
> >>> + - master_bus
> >>> + - slave_bus
> >>> + - tx
> >>> + - rx
> >>> + - master2_bus
> >>> + - slave2_bus
> >>> + - eqos_rxclk_mux
> >>> + - eqos_phyrxclk
> >>> + - dout_peric_rgmii_clk
> >>
> >> This does not match the previous entry. It should be strictly ordered
> >> with
> >> minItems: 5.
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > Thanks for reviewing.
> > In FSD SoC, we have 2 instances of ethernet in two blocks.
> > One instance needs 5 clocks and the other needs 10 clocks.
>
> I understand and I do not think this is contradictory to what I asked.
> If it is, then why/how?
>
> >
> > I tried to understand this by looking at some other dt-binding files
> > as given below, but looks like they follow similar approach
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/stm32-dwmac.yaml
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml
> >
> > Could you please guide me on how to implement this?
> > Also, please help me understand what is meant by 'strictly ordered'
>
> Every other 99% of bindings. Just like your clocks property.
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your feedback.
I want to make sure I fully understand your comment.
I can see we have added clocks and clock names in the same order.
Could you please help in detail what specifically needs to be modified regarding the ordering and minItems/maxItems usage?
-Swathi
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list