[PATCH v4 00/12] Initial support for SMMUv3 nested translation

Baolu Lu baolu.lu at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 13 03:57:51 PST 2025


On 2025/2/5 11:45, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2025/1/23 3:26, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 01:55:22PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> I need your help to remove IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF from the intel
>>>>> driver. I have a patch series that eliminates it from all the other
>>>>> drivers, and I wrote a patch to remove FEAT_SVA from intel..
>>>> Yes, sure. Let's make this happen in the next cycle.
>>>>
>>>> FEAT_IOPF could be removed. IOPF manipulation can be handled in the
>>>> domain attachment path. A per-device refcount can be implemented. This
>>>> count increments with each iopf-capable domain attachment and 
>>>> decrements
>>>> with each detachment. PCI PRI is enabled for the first iopf-capable
>>>> domain and disabled when the last one is removed. Probably we can also
>>>> solve the PF/VF sharing PRI issue.
>>> Here is what I have so far, if you send me a patch for vt-d to move
>>> FEAT_IOPF into attach as you describe above (see what I did to arm for
>>> example), then I can send it next cycle
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/iommu_no_feat/
>> Hey Baolu, a reminder on this, lets try for it next cycle?
> 
> Oh, I forgot this. Thanks for the reminding. Sure, let's try to make it
> in the next cycle.

Hi Jason,

I've worked through the entire series. The patches are available here:

https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/iommu-no-feat-v6.14-rc2

Please check if this is the right direction.

Thanks,
baolu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list