Linux 6.19-rc1 mediatek mt7921e broke badly

Shuah Khan skhan at linuxfoundation.org
Tue Dec 30 20:07:53 PST 2025


On 12/30/25 21:00, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/30/25 18:57, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 05:27:13PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 at 15:57, Shuah Khan <skhan at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend reverting f804a5895eba instead of trying
>>>> fix it. Then find a better way to eliminate extra newline that
>>>> shows up in dmesg when firmware build date happens to have
>>>> a newline.
>>>
>>> Yeah. Let's revert it.
>>>
>>> And the way to fix the extra newline is trivial: just remove it from
>>> the "dev_info()" format string.
>>>
>>> Our kernel printing logic will add a newline for the next line anyway
>>> if it is missing (unless somebody explicitly uses PR_CONT).
>>>
>>> Can whoever saw the problem confirm that just a revert and a "remove
>>> \n from that dev_info()" fixes the output for them?
>>
>> That works for me.  The revert by itself makes the FORTIFY_SOURCE crash
>> go away and reintroduces a blank line in the log.  Removing the \n from
>> the string passed to dev_info as well makes the blank line go away.
>>
> 
> I just sent the revert. I will try removing \n from dev_info()
> later on tomorrow.
> 
> My quick trial still showed extra line which didn't make sense
> to me. More trials have to wait for tomorrow.
> 

Hmm - there are 3 places that print build_date in  mt76_connac2_load_ram()

3022         dev_info(dev->dev, "WM Firmware Version: %.10s, Build Time: %.15s\n     ",
3023                  hdr->fw_ver, hdr->build_date);


3051         dev_info(dev->dev, "WA Firmware Version: %.10s, Build Time: %.15s\n     ",
3052                  hdr->fw_ver, hdr->build_date);

3127         dev_info(dev->dev, "HW/SW Version: 0x%x, Build Time: %.16s\n",
3128                  be32_to_cpu(hdr->hw_sw_ver), hdr->build_date);

The last one prints %.16s and other two do %.15s - is the fix simply
changing last one on line 3127 to print %.15s - this avoids printing
the extra \n?

thanks,
-- Shuah



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list