[PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Update Data Modul i.MX8M Plus eDM SBC DT to rev.903

[Shawn Guo]

On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 03:53:53AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/29/25 3:42 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 11:24:29AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 12/27/24 4:18 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello Shawn,
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:13:27 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > Update the DT to match newest Data Modul i.MX8M Plus eDM SBC rev.903
> > > > > board which implements significant changes. Keep some of the rev.900
> > > > > and rev.902 nodes in the DT so that a DTO can be used to support old
> > > > > rev.900 and rev.902 boards easily.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-data-modul-edm-sbc.dtb: tpm at 2e: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > > > 	['st,st33tphf2ei2c', 'tcg,tpm-tis-i2c'] is too long
> > > > 	'st,st33tphf2ei2c' is not one of ['infineon,slb9673', 'nuvoton,npct75x', 'st,st33ktpm2xi2c']
> > > 
> > > This is addressed in bindings patch [1] . Can this patch and the bindings
> > > patch be applied ?
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241226171124.83735-1-marex@denx.de/
> > 
> > Could you resend them?
> Why ? The emails are in lore/patchwork and the patches still apply just
> fine, don't they ?

A couple of reasons:

- The patches were sent one year ago.
- They should be in a single series, as binding change is a prerequisite of DTS one.

Shawn