[PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:28:33AM +0000, Ahmed Tiba wrote:
> Platforms that rely on firmware-first RAS today only get the full Linux
> handling pipeline when the records arrive through ACPI/APEI GHES. This
> series lifts the generic parts of GHES into a reusable estatus core, wires

Why is this thing called "error status"?

Why is error status so significant so that you need to call it a thing,
much less a "core"?

It looks like you basically want to dump error records from a system
which doesn't support GHES into the common path so they get decoded?

I mean, I'm only guessing because I don't get any wiser from this text.

So how about you give the high-level, practical use spiel first? What's
the use case?

Then we can talk implementation details.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette