[PATCH v4 11/31] clk: at91: clk-usb: add support for clk_parent_data

[Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com]

On 10/20/25 12:17, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi, Ryan,
> 
> On 9/19/25 00:15, Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
>>
>> Add support for clk_parent_data in usb clock driver.
>>
>> All the SoC based drivers that rely on clk-usb were adapted
>> to the new API change. The switch itself for SoCs will be done
>> in subsequent patches.
>>
>> Remove the use of __clk_get_hw() for the slow clocks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
>> [ryan.wanner at microchip: Add SAMA7D65 and SAM9X75 SoCs to the changes.
>> Change how the main_xtal and slcks are initialized so they match the
>> parent_data API]
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/at91/at91rm9200.c  |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9260.c |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9g45.c |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9n12.c |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/at91sam9x5.c  |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c     | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  drivers/clk/at91/dt-compat.c   |  6 ++---
>>  drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h         | 11 +++++----
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c      | 21 +++++++++--------
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sama5d2.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sama5d3.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sama5d4.c     |  2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/at91/sama7d65.c    | 24 +++++++++++---------
>>  14 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -882,10 +885,10 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>>
>>       sam9x7_pmc->chws[PMC_MCK] = hw;
>>
>> -     parent_names[0] = "plla_divpmcck";
>> -     parent_names[1] = "upll_divpmcck";
>> -     parent_names[2] = "main_osc";
>> -     usbck_hw = sam9x60_clk_register_usb(regmap, "usbck", parent_names, 3);
>> +     parent_data[0] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x7_plls[PLL_ID_PLLA][PLL_COMPID_DIV0].hw);
>> +     parent_data[1] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(sam9x7_plls[PLL_ID_UPLL][PLL_COMPID_DIV0].hw);
>> +     parent_data[2] = AT91_CLK_PD_HW(main_osc_hw);
>> +     usbck_hw = sam9x60_clk_register_usb(regmap, "usbck", NULL, parent_data, 3);
> 
> sam9x60_clk_register_usb() could be converted to use parent_hws member of
> struct clk_init_data instead of parent_data.

So this would mean that I would pass in an array of the plls as
parent_hws, and use that to load the clk_init_data struct instead of
filling the array of parent_data as it is changed to in this patch set?

And this would be functionally the same since parent_data points to
clk_hw?>