[PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add "rpmsg" subnode support
Shenwei Wang
shenwei.wang at nxp.com
Wed Dec 17 11:45:10 PST 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add
> "rpmsg" subnode support
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 01:43:37PM -0600, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > Remote processors may announce multiple devices (e.g., I2C, GPIO) over
> > an RPMSG channel.
>
> Which channel does that happen on?
It runs on the RPMSG Control channel.
>
> > These devices may require corresponding device tree nodes, especially
> > when acting as providers, to supply phandles for their consumers.
> >
> > Define an RPMSG node to work as a container for a group of RPMSG
> > channels under the imx_rproc node.
> >
> > Each subnode within "rpmsg" represents an individual RPMSG channel.
> > The name of each subnode corresponds to the channel name as defined by
> > the remote processor.
> >
> > All remote devices associated with a given channel are defined as
> > child nodes under the corresponding channel node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++
> > .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b3e1a5dbf731
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-rpmsg.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +
> > +title: Generic GPIO driver over RPMSG
>
> The driver doesn't go over RPMSG. It's a GPIO provider or protocol.
>
Yes, it might be clearer to phrase it as 'Generic RPMSG GPIO Controller,' since this is
a GPIO controller driver that operates over the RPMsg bus.
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang at nxp.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + On an AMP platform, some GPIO controllers are exposed by the remote
> > +processor
> > + through the RPMSG bus. The RPMSG GPIO transport protocol defines
> > +the packet
> > + structure and communication flow between Linux and the remote
> > +firmware. Those
> > + controllers are managed via this transport protocol.
>
> Got a reference to where any of this is defined?
Will add a ref to the gpio-rpmsg.rst doc.
>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,rpmsg-gpio
> > + - const: rpmsg-gpio
> > + - const: rpmsg-gpio
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> I still don't understand how 'reg' is determined. You may have explained it
> previously, but *this* patch needs to make me understand.
>
I see. Will add a description for this item.
> > +
> > + "#gpio-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + gpio-controller: true
> > memory-region = <&vdev0buffer>, <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>,
> <&rsc_table>;
> > syscon = <&src>;
> > +
> > + rpmsg {
>
> What's the purpose of this node? Is it going to contain things other than "rpmsg io
> channels"?
It represents the RPMSG bus between Linux and the remote processor, and will eventually
host additional channels such as rpmsg-i2c-channel and rpmsg-pwm-channel.
Thanks,
Shenwei
>
> > + rpmsg-io-channel {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + gpio at 0 {
> > + compatible = "rpmsg-gpio";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&rpmsg_gpioa>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio at 1 {
> > + compatible = "rpmsg-gpio";
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&rpmsg_gpiob>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > };
> > ...
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list