[PATCH 4/4] Input: stmfts - use client to make future code cleaner

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi David,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 03:30:04PM +0100, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Petr Hodina <petr.hodina at protonmail.com>
> 
> Make code cleaner, compiler will optimize it away anyway.
> 
> Preparation for FTM5 support, where more steps are needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Hodina <petr.hodina at protonmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david at ixit.cz>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c
> index 4b166b0a9a5a6..06845a00348cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c
> @@ -747,9 +747,10 @@ static int stmfts_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  static int stmfts_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct stmfts_data *sdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct i2c_client *client = sdata->client;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte(sdata->client, STMFTS_SLEEP_OUT);
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, STMFTS_SLEEP_OUT);

Sorry but I do not see how using a temporary cleans things up compared
to a simple structure member access, given that it happens only once
here.

>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to resume device: %d\n", ret);
>  
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry