[PATCH 08/32] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Sanitize ID_AA64PFR2_EL1.GCIE
Sascha Bischoff
Sascha.Bischoff at arm.com
Fri Dec 12 07:22:37 PST 2025
Set the guest's view of the GCIE field to IMP when running a GICv5 VM,
NI otherwise. Reject any writes to the register that try to do
anything but set GCIE to IMP when running a GICv5 VM.
As part of this change, we also introduce vgic_is_v5(kvm), in order to
check if the guest is a GICv5-native VM. We're also required to extend
vgic_is_v3_compat to check for the actual vgic_model. This has one
potential issue - if any of the vgic_is_v* checks are used prior to
setting the vgic_model (that is, before kvm_vgic_create) then
vgic_model will be set to 0, which can result in a false-positive.
Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff at arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index c8fd7c6a12a13..a065f8939bc8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1758,6 +1758,7 @@ static u8 pmuver_to_perfmon(u8 pmuver)
static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr1_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
+static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr2_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
static u64 sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
@@ -1783,10 +1784,7 @@ static u64 __kvm_read_sanitised_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
val = sanitise_id_aa64pfr1_el1(vcpu, val);
break;
case SYS_ID_AA64PFR2_EL1:
- val &= ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_FPMR |
- (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ?
- ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR | ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY :
- 0);
+ val = sanitise_id_aa64pfr2_el1(vcpu, val);
break;
case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
@@ -2024,6 +2022,20 @@ static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr1_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
return val;
}
+static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr2_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
+{
+ val &= ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_FPMR |
+ (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ?
+ ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR | ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY : 0);
+
+ if (vgic_is_v5(vcpu->kvm)) {
+ val &= ~ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_MASK;
+ val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1, GCIE, IMP);
+ }
+
+ return val;
+}
+
static u64 sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
{
val = ID_REG_LIMIT_FIELD_ENUM(val, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, DebugVer, V8P8);
@@ -2221,6 +2233,16 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, user_val);
}
+static int set_id_aa64pfr2_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 user_val)
+{
+ if (vgic_is_v5(vcpu->kvm) &&
+ FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_MASK, user_val) != ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE_IMP)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, user_val);
+}
+
/*
* Allow userspace to de-feature a stage-2 translation granule but prevent it
* from claiming the impossible.
@@ -3202,10 +3224,11 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_RES0 |
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MPAM_frac |
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE)),
- ID_WRITABLE(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1,
- ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_FPMR |
- ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR |
- ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY),
+ ID_FILTERED(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1, id_aa64pfr2_el1,
+ ~(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_FPMR |
+ ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTEFAR |
+ ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_MTESTOREONLY |
+ ID_AA64PFR2_EL1_GCIE)),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
ID_WRITABLE(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ~ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_RES0),
ID_HIDDEN(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1),
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
index 5f0fc96b4dc29..bf5bae023751b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -455,8 +455,16 @@ void vgic_v3_nested_update_mi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static inline bool vgic_is_v3_compat(struct kvm *kvm)
{
+ /*
+ * We need to be careful here. This could be called early,
+ * which means that there is no vgic_model set. For the time
+ * being, fall back to assuming that we're trying run a legacy
+ * VM in that case, which keeps existing software happy. Long
+ * term, this will need to be revisited a little.
+ */
return cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_GICV5_CPUIF) &&
- kvm_vgic_global_state.has_gcie_v3_compat;
+ kvm_vgic_global_state.has_gcie_v3_compat &&
+ kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model != KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V5;
}
static inline bool vgic_is_v3(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -464,6 +472,11 @@ static inline bool vgic_is_v3(struct kvm *kvm)
return kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V3 || vgic_is_v3_compat(kvm);
}
+static inline bool vgic_is_v5(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V5 && !vgic_is_v3_compat(kvm);
+}
+
int vgic_its_debug_init(struct kvm_device *dev);
void vgic_its_debug_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev);
--
2.34.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list