Issues with DRM_ACCEL_ROCKET (Oops, power-domain, probe-ordering)

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net
Tue Dec 9 22:50:36 PST 2025


On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:31 AM Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Tomeu,
>
> On 12/9/2025 2:55 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 8:00 AM Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > This need was questioned during the review process, and during my
> > stress testing I didn't find a need for core 0 to be treated
> > specially. So it was considered unneeded complexity and the code was
> > dropped.
> >
>
> Oh, I just noticed that the commit comment in the devicetree still
> contains a relevant description.
>
> > My testing involves running the supported models as a whole, and also
> > their individual operations as individual tests. I run them in 8
> > parallel processes, in batches so we have continuous bring up and down
> > of clients.
> >
> > I'm a bit surprised that that testing worked stably but we have still
> > failures in some setups.
>
> Could you please describe the failures that still exist? Thank you.

I was referring to the ones that Quentin reported when starting this thread.

Regards,

Tomeu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list