[PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix hash_name() and branch predictor issues

Xie Yuanbin xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com
Mon Dec 8 18:52:16 PST 2025


On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 16:47:24 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Also, would you mind giving ASAP some tested-by/reviewed-by for these
> patches so they can be pushed out to linux-next for a bit of testing
> there pelase? I'm on vacation from Thursday, so time is very short
> to get these out - if we're not ready by Wednesday, then it'll be the
> new year, possibly after the 11th January, before I can do anything
> further (medical stuff.)
>
> Thanks.

As mentioned in the previous email, this(these patches) should be the
best solution, I think. And I have carefully read the three patches, so:

Reviewed-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1 at huawei.com>

As for testing, I can perform some simple tests myself, and I am trying
to let the testing team to help with some further testing, like
syzkaller.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list